I’ve previously told you about #GABA, I also highlighted that it’s questionable whether its use as a growth hormone (#GH) booster is actually going to yield visible improvements in your physique… on the other hand, the GH response to workouts was – next to cortisol – the only hormonal correlate West et al. (see Figure 1, in previous article) observed in the best and IMHO only decently well powered long(er)-term study investigating what Stuart Philips called “a hormonal ghost” (Philips 2012), i.e. the contribution of the transient increase in growth hormone, testosterone, IGF1, etc. in the hour/s after a workout.
Now, GABA has been found to trigger similarly transient increases in GH as resistance training. Unlike the effects of straight exogenous human growth hormone (#HGH), the effects of GABA on muscle protein synthesis have not yet been studied in humans… not yet? Yes, this means it has been done.
In their latest paper, scientists from the R&D department of Pharma Foods International report on the results of an experiment in which they examined “the effects of oral GABA plus whey protein supplementation on muscular hypertrophy in men after progressive resistance training” (Sakashita 2019). In that, you guessed it, …
the not exactly 100% unbiased scientists hypothesized that “GABA administration with post-exercise protein supplementation may enhance training-induced muscle hypertrophy concomitant with elevated resting plasma GH concentrations” (ibid.)
To test the hypothesis, the scientists conducted a randomized double-blind parallel-group design study involving N=21 healthy, non-exercising men (26 – 48 years) who were randomized to receive
- whey protein isolate (Lactocrystal®) at a daily dosage of 10 g) or the same
- whey protein isolate + 100 mg of GABA (80% pure Pharma GABA® produced by fermentation)
daily for 12 weeks. With regard to the way the supplement was consumed, the scientists write:
“Subjects were instructed to ingest the supplements within 15 min of training, or before sleep on a non-exercise day. Each supplement was dissolved in 150 mL water immediately before ingestion.”
The whey protein powder was a whey protein isolate (Lactocrystal®; Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd, Kyoto, Japan); the GABA powder was produced through natural fermentation using a specific lactic acid bacteria strain (Pharma GABA®; 80% purity; Pharma Foods International Co., Ltd, Kyoto, Japan).
|If you want to stack something w/ your whey protein, it should be creatine – especially if you’re a vegan (elderly) trainee as you’ve learned in my 2017 article “Creatine Non-Responder? Age+Meat Intake – Determinants of Creatine’s Effect on PCr (±200%) + Probably Performance”.|
How did they train? Here’s the authors’ summary: “The resistance training program included five upper-body and lower-body exercises: leg press, leg extension, leg curl, chest press, and pull down (LifeFitness, Schiller Park, IL, USA). Both groups performed the same training program. Training sessions were completed within 60 min and included the following: 5 min, warm-up (ergometer cycling); 45 min, resistance exercise; and 10 min, stretching exercise.
This training program was performed twice per week in a fitness club with training equipment and included one unsupervised and one professional trainer-supervised session per week. All resistance exercises were performed in three sets (12 repetitions; 2 – 3 min rest periods).
[…] Exercise intensity was set at 50% maximal strength for the first week and then raised to 60% after week 1. Weights were progressively increased in 2.5 – 5 kg intervals when the prescribed repetitions could be completed. The trainer ensured that subjects provided maximum effort and intensity for all supervised training sessions. Subjects were instructed to only perform exercises as part of the training program; those who missed three exercise sessions were excluded from the analysis” (ibid.) – whether the non-preregistered study was adequately powered was not reported, by the way … 🤔
The main outcomes were the 12-week increases in maximal strength which were not tested directly, but calculated by dividing weight by percentage of RM, as well as body composition (fat-free mass, fat mass, and total body mass), which was assessed for all subjects using dual-energy X-ray (#DXA) absorptiometry, and plasma GH concentrations, which were measured using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for human GH.
As it’s common for any training + supplementation study, not all subjects made it to the finish line: Five subjects excluded from the analysis because of personal reasons (WP, n = 1; WP + GABA, n = 1), not completing 90% of supplement intake requirements (WP, n = 1), and not completing 90% of exercise sessions (WP, n = 1; WP + GABA, n = 1). Thus, 21 subjects completed the 12-week program (WP, n = 10, 40.1 ± 7.9 years; WP + GABA, n = 11, 38.8 ± 5.7 years). For all of them, it can be said that:
Neither the training nor the supplements significantly changed either the energy content or the macronutrient composition of the subjects’ diets!
What the combination of resistance training + 10g of whey that was consumed on top of rather marginal protein intakes of 1g/kg body weight per day did, though, was to trigger significant changes in body composition – total lean mass to be precise.
|Figure 1: Change in body composition after 12 weeks as measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. (a) Whole body fat-free mass and (b) arm and leg lean mass. Values represent the mean ± standard error for 10 subjects (WP) or 11 subjects (WP + GABA). *P < 0.05 vs. the WP group (Sakashita 2019).|
Now, that’s per se not surprising. After all, we’re talking about training noobs, but what is surprising (at least to me) is both the statistical significance as well as the absolute size of the differences in lean mass gains in the “whey only” vs. “whey plus GABA” group, you can see in Figure 1.
|Figure 2: Max. strength increased significantly in both groups, but there was absolutely no effect of GABA – not even on leg presses (p = 0.040), bros – and it happens to be in line with the observations in West 2012: no interaction between GH and strength (Sakashita 2019).|
A significant time effect was also observed for the strength parameters which increased
Two additional observations are interesting and potentially worth considering: the difference between total extra lean mass gains and arm and leg lean mass gains (Figure 1), and the decline of the GH boosting effects of GABA over time (Figure 3).
In fact, if you scrutinize the data in Figure 3, you will realize that timing is the only relevant inter-group difference – the direct comparison of the increases didn’t yield significant results (even if it may initially look like that).
You may have to cycle GABA to see benefits: Before we draw some final conclusions, though, let me briefly address what I consider to be an important but easily overlooked implication of the study at hand: if it even works, you probably need to cycle GABA, as its effects wear off within 1-2 months and it’s not clear if they return after another 2 months of abstinence… since you’ll by then be no newby, anymore, it’s questionable whether this 2nd ‘cycle’ will yield significant results, at all – even in the less relevant “total lean mass” category. Ah, … and with the age of the study’s participants ranging from the early-20s to the mid-40s, the corresponding “GABA-cycling”-trial should also investigate whether the need for and/or optimal timing of these cycles depends on biological, not just on training age.
What? Ok, let’s rephrase that: (a) both WP + GABA + training and WP only + training lead to statistically significant increases in growth hormone, but (b) it took 8 weeks vs. 4 weeks in the WP only group for these changes to reach statistical significance over the baseline levels in this group – and again (c) an inter-group difference was not observed at any point during the study due to the high variability of the GH levels.
|Figure 3: Resting plasma growth hormone concentrations. Values represent the mean ± standard error for 10 subjects (WP) or 11 subjects (WP + GABA). *P < 0.05 vs. baseline of the WP + GABA group; **P < 0.05 vs. baseline of the WP group.|
So what do we make of these results, then? Well, let’s first address the usual confounders: (a) the subjects were untrained, results may differ for a trained population (the amount of lean mass gained, for example, is likely to be smaller), (b) protein nutrition is beyond current recommendations for strength trainees (up to 3g/kg | ISSN), hence different overall gains and inter-group differences may be expected from studies in populations with higher protein intakes.
- Erdö, Sándor L., and Joachim R. Wolff. “γ‐Aminobutyric acid outside the mammalian brain.” Journal of neurochemistry 54.2 (1990): 363-372.
- Gladkevich, A., et al. “The peripheral GABAergic system as a target in endocrine disorders.” Autonomic Neuroscience 124.1-2 (2006): 1-8.
- Gomez, Rosane, et al. “GABA agonists differentially modify blood glucose levels of diabetic rats.” The Japanese Journal of Pharmacology 80.4 (1999): 327-331.
- Phillips, Stuart M. “Strength and hypertrophy with resistance training: chasing a hormonal ghost.” European journal of applied physiology 112.5 (2012): 1981-1983.
- Sakashita, Maya, et al. “Oral Supplementation Using Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid and Whey Protein Improves Whole Body Fat-Free Mass in Men After Resistance Training.” Journal of Clinical Medicine Research 11.6 (2019): 428-434.
- Wan, Yun, Qinghua Wang, and Gerald J. Prud’homme. “GABAergic system in the endocrine pancreas: a new target for diabetes treatment.” Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity: targets and therapy 8 (2015): 79.
- West, Daniel WD, and Stuart M. Phillips. “Associations of exercise-induced hormone profiles and gains in strength and hypertrophy in a large cohort after weight training.” European journal of applied physiology 112.7 (2012): 2693-2702.
- Yamatsu, Atsushi, et al. “Effect of oral γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) administration on sleep and its absorption in humans.” Food science and biotechnology 25.2 (2016): 547-551.