I tested the Amazfit Active Max to answer a simple question: is this smartwatch a reliable daily tracker for heart rate, sleep stages, and GPS-based workouts? This review breaks down the hardware, real-world measurement performance, strengths, weaknesses, and practical buying advice for anyone considering the Amazfit Active Max.

Recommended pick
Fast shipping (Amazon)
Best for daily fitness

Amazfit Active Max

A sleek smartwatch built for everyday wear: workouts, health tracking, and a clean, modern look that works
at the gym and outside it.

Beautiful display
Sharp, readable screen for stats and notifications.

Fitness-first features
Great for training days and daily activity tracking.

All-day comfort
Light, wearable design that looks premium.

Top value pick
Strong feature set for the price category.

Check price on Amazon
→

See details
↗

Tip: Place this box right after your intro paragraph for best conversions.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

What the Amazfit Active Max is and who it targets

The Amazfit Active Max is a mid-size AMOLED smartwatch that positions itself as a highly usable, battery-friendly daily fitness companion. It targets people who want useful coaching, recovery insight, and phone-free workouts without paying premium prices for advanced sport features. In short, it aims at the “consistent mover”—someone who values readable displays, long battery life, offline music or maps, and sensible health metrics more than absolute elite-level GPS or pro-level sport sensors.

Quick spec overview

• Display: 1.5-inch round AMOLED, 480 x 480 resolution, very bright peak (up to 3,000 nits).
• Battery: Large cell with multi-day claims (typical daily use up to 25 days; heavy use lower). Up to ~64 hours continuous GPS in manufacturer scenarios.
• Sensors: Biotracker PPG 6.0 optical heart rate, accelerometer, gyroscope, geomagnetic sensor, ambient light, skin temperature, barometric altimeter.
• GPS: Single-band L1 GNSS (no dual-frequency L5/L1).
• Other: Microphone, speaker, Bluetooth 5.3, 4 GB storage for music and offline maps, 22mm standard strap, 5 ATM water resistance.

The hardware is clearly built around battery life and screen clarity. The trade-off is no dual-frequency GPS and a moderate 4 GB of storage—enough for offline playlists and small map sets, but limited compared to higher-end sport watches.

Key features that matter in daily use

• Readable display: The very bright AMOLED and a 1.5-inch screen make on-wrist glanceability excellent in daylight and during workouts.
• Offline media and maps: 4 GB supports local music, podcasts, and offline route maps—useful when you leave your phone at home.
• Guidance and recovery: Built-in workout modes (160+), AI training plans, and recovery/energy metrics (BioCharge-style metric) focus on consistency and readiness rather than deep performance analytics.

How the Amazfit Active Max performs: measurement breakdown

I focus on three practical measures that determine whether the watch’s coaching and recovery features are trustworthy: heart rate accuracy during typical activities, sleep stage tracking, and GPS route accuracy. Below I summarize the real-world behavior and provide action items for different users.

Heart rate: general patterns

The Amazfit Active Max uses a modern Biotracker optical sensor. Optical sensors are fine for steady-state monitoring and running, but wrist-based readings still struggle under heavy arm motion, high wrist tension, or when the watch shifts during activity.

Indoor cycling

Indoor cycling is typically the easiest activity for wrist-based PPG because wrist motion is relatively stable. The Amazfit Active Max performs well in this environment. Expect tight agreement with chest-strap references during steady intervals and good detection of heart rate dips during recovery periods. This makes the watch suitable for guided indoor workouts and training plans that rely on heart rate zones.

Running

Running shows strong and consistent heart rate tracking on the Amazfit Active Max for most users. Correlation to a chest strap reference is high during outdoor runs, and the watch handles cadence changes and intervals well. For runners who want heartbeat-driven pacing and feedback without a chest strap, the Amazfit Active Max is a practical choice.

Outdoor cycling

This is the watch’s weak spot. Outdoor cycling often leads to lower-than-actual wrist readings when the forearm undergoes repeated impacts, gripping, or varying temperatures that change fit and contact. If you ride on rough roads, sprint or climb hard, or frequently change body position, wrist-based heart rate dips are likely. For accurate outdoor cycling HR, pair the watch with a chest strap or an external cadence/HR sensor.

Weightlifting and resistance training

Wrist optical sensors generally struggle during resistance training because muscle contraction and wrist tension distort blood flow and optical coupling. Expect undercounts of peak heart rates during sets and better detection between sets. If you use heart rate for work/rest control during lifting, use a chest strap or armband sensor for reliable peaks.

Sleep tracking: stages and limitations

Sleep stage tracking is one of the hardest sensor challenges for wrist devices. The Amazfit Active Max provides reasonable detection of deep sleep and light sleep, but it struggles to reliably identify REM sleep. Practically:

• Deep sleep: High agreement with EEG-based references for many users, making deep sleep estimates useful for recovery insight.
• Light sleep: Good alignment overall.
• REM sleep: Lower agreement and frequent misclassification as light sleep.

If you need clinical-grade sleep staging or precise REM tracking for health reasons, consider a dedicated EEG mattress sensor or validated ring-based devices. For general sleep timing, total sleep, and deep sleep trends, the Amazfit Active Max is adequate.

GPS and route accuracy

The Amazfit Active Max uses single-band L1 GNSS. In open environments the GPS tracks pace and route consistently. Expect the following:

• Good performance on regular runs in parks or suburban areas.
• Possible smoothing around tight corners; minor deviations in dense tree cover or near tall buildings.
• Not ideal for very demanding mapping requirements where dual-frequency GPS excels (dense urban canyons, narrow mountain valleys).

For most recreational runners and cyclists who want reliable distance, pace, and route maps, the GPS is solid given the price and battery trade-offs.

Software, storage, and daily usability

The Amazfit Active Max includes usable smartwatch features: notification handling, music and podcast storage, offline maps for phone-free navigation, and basic voice interaction through mic and speaker. The 4 GB storage is enough for playlists and a few maps, but heavy media users or long offline trip planners should manage library size or rely on streaming from a phone when available.

Comparison: how the Amazfit Active Max sits in the lineup

Compared to cheaper Amazfit models, the Active Max emphasizes a larger, brighter display and stronger battery life. Against higher-end Amazfit watches (with dual-band GNSS, higher water resistance, or titanium builds), the Active Max is a value-focused middle child. If you want dual-frequency GPS, deeper sport profiles, or a higher water rating for serious water sports, consider the higher-tier models instead.

Pros and cons

• Pros
  • Very bright, large AMOLED display that is easy to read outdoors.
  • Long battery life for a smartwatch with smart features.
  • Offline music and maps enable phone-free sessions.
  • Solid heart rate tracking for running and indoor cycling.
  • Practical recovery and coaching features aimed at consistency.
• Cons
  • No dual-frequency GPS—can struggle in challenging GPS environments.
  • Wrist HR accuracy drops during outdoor cycling and weightlifting for some users.
  • Sleep stage detection underperforms for REM classification.
  • 4 GB storage is modest compared to premium models.

Who should buy the Amazfit Active Max?

Consider the Amazfit Active Max if you match any of these profiles:

• You want a bright, easy-to-read display and long battery life for daily wear.
• You are a recreational runner or gym-goer who values guidance and recovery metrics over pro-level sensor fidelity.
• You want offline music and maps on a budget-friendly smartwatch.

Skip the Amazfit Active Max if:

• You need precise wrist heart rate for outdoor cycling, high-intensity interval training, or lifting without using an external sensor.
• You require dual-frequency GPS for mapping in urban canyons or mountainous terrain.
• You need medical-grade sleep staging and REM accuracy.

Practical tips to get the best accuracy from the Amazfit Active Max

1. Fit is crucial: Place the watch snugly above the wrist bone. A loose fit produces motion artifacts and poorer optical coupling during workouts.
2. Warm up the sensor: Cold skin and loose clothing can reduce contact. Warm the wrist with light motion or a brief warm-up to improve readings.
3. Use external sensors when necessary: For outdoor cycling and heavy resistance training, pair a Bluetooth chest strap or a biceps armband for accurate peaks.
4. Manage offline media: Keep playlists trimmed to fit the 4 GB capacity; remove maps after long trips to free space.
5. Check firmware updates: Sensor and algorithm performance can improve with software updates. Install updates whenever available.

Common misconceptions and pitfalls

• Optical heart rate is not uniformly reliable. Good performance for runs or steady cardio does not guarantee accurate peaks during resistance training or when gripping a handlebar tightly.
• High peak brightness does not equal better sensors. The bright AMOLED helps visibility, but it has no direct effect on heart rate or GPS accuracy.
• Storage is limited. 4 GB is useful but finite—expect to manage space if you rely heavily on offline media.

Final verdict

The Amazfit Active Max is a strong value proposition for users who want a readable, long-lasting smartwatch that handles running and general fitness well, supports offline media, and provides helpful recovery and training guidance. It falls short where wrist-based optical sensors typically do—outdoor cycling and heavy resistance workouts—and it does not include dual-frequency GPS. If you prioritize battery, screen, and daily coaching, the Amazfit Active Max is a smart buy. If you need exact sport-grade measurements, consider adding a dedicated heart monitor or stepping up to a higher-end model with dual-band GNSS.

FAQ

Is the Amazfit Active Max good for running?

Yes. The Amazfit Active Max delivers strong wrist-based heart rate and GPS performance for most recreational runners. It provides reliable pace and distance and is well-suited for guided training plans that do not require pro-level measurement precision.

Should I use a chest strap with the Amazfit Active Max?

If you do outdoor cycling, heavy interval training, or weightlifting and need accurate peak heart rates, pairing a chest strap or arm-based sensor is recommended. For regular running and indoor workouts, the built-in optical sensor is usually sufficient.

Does the Amazfit Active Max have dual-band GPS?

No. It uses single-band L1 GNSS. This is fine for open-area runs and general route tracking but not as robust as dual-frequency GPS in signal-challenging locations like dense urban areas or deep valleys.

How long does the battery last on the Amazfit Active Max?

Battery life varies by usage. Typical manufacturer estimates range from multiple days up to several weeks in low-use scenarios. Continuous GPS runtime is in the range of a couple of days under nonstop use; expect shorter battery life with high-brightness, always-on display, and frequent GPS sessions.

Can I store music and podcasts on the Amazfit Active Max?

Yes. The watch includes around 4 GB of onboard storage for music, podcasts, and offline maps. It supports local playback for phone-free activities but you should manage the library size due to limited capacity.

The Brooks Ghost 17 is the update a lot of people were waiting for. I have long been skeptical of the Ghost line — too much predictability, too little excitement — but this iteration finally moves the model in a direction that feels thoughtful rather than incremental. If you want a reliable daily trainer with a familiar stability profile but with subtle improvements that matter, the Brooks Ghost 17 deserves a serious look.

Is Brooks Ghost 17 a Good Daily Running Shoe for Most Runners?

Yes—Brooks Ghost 17 is a reliable daily trainer for runners who want consistent cushioning, stable transitions, and all-purpose mileage comfort without an aggressive ride profile.

What changed: a short spec overview

At first glance the Brooks Ghost 17 keeps the Ghost blueprint intact: cushioned, durable, and broadly approachable. The headline specs are simple and meaningful:

• Stack height: 36.5 mm heel, 26.5 mm forefoot (10 mm drop).
• Midsole: DNA Loft Version 3—Brooks’ latest DNA Loft formulation.
• Outsole: Thick rubber with updated flex grooves and heavy durability focus.
• Upper: New air mesh, Achilles flare in the heel, generous padding, short tongue.
• Weight: Stated 10.1 ounces / 286 grams (men’s).

Two numbers stand out: the drop and the stack. The Brooks Ghost 17 reduces the drop from the Ghost’s long-standing 12 mm to 10 mm and adds a touch more forefoot stack. That alone shifts how the shoe feels underfoot.

First impressions on the foot

The moment you step into the Brooks Ghost 17 you notice the comfort focus. The heel collar is bulked up, and Brooks added an Achilles flare for a different silhouette and a slightly different lockdown. They reinforced the top of that flare so it stays rigid instead of floppy, and the padding around the heel is generous enough to provide a soft entry without feeling sloppy.

The upper uses what they call an air mesh. It is stretchy and forgiving, which means the shoe is comfortable for running, walking, or even wearing casually. I found the fit true to size and consistent with prior Ghost fits. If you need extra room, Brooks ships the Ghost 17 in wide and extra-wide versions, so the brand keeps that approachable fit philosophy intact.

On-road ride and midsole behavior

Out on the road the Brooks Ghost 17 is, to my surprise, one of the better Ghosts I have run in since the Ghost Max when they tried a different direction with cushioning. The DNA Loft Version 3 feels familiar but refreshed. It still carries a responsive, slightly dense signature, but there is finally a softer note beneath the foot that the Ghost has been missing.

That said, the midsole is not a plush, cloud-like daily. It leans toward the firmer side of comfortable. If your ideal trainer is ultra-soft and bouncy, the Brooks Ghost 17 may feel too grounded. But if you want predictability, a clear roll-off, and a stable platform that doesn’t fight you, the Ghost 17 delivers.

Stability without shouting

The Brooks Ghost 17 feels stable. There are design cues under the arch and into the medial heel that make it clear Brooks tuned this model to resist collapse. You can see it on the outsole where the rubber pattern and sculpting suggest reinforcement. That doesn’t translate into intrusive correction; it simply means the shoe holds your foot in a predictable, confidence-inspiring way.

If you overpronate mildly and have been wary of wearing a purely neutral shoe, the Ghost 17’s light stability elements could be the sweet spot: supportive enough to reduce inward roll without feeling like you’re wearing a corrective device.

Outsole and flexibility: more purposeful than before

One of the most tangible updates to the Brooks Ghost 17 is the outsole. Brooks kept the heavy, tank-like rubber that has made Ghost outsoles famous for longevity. But they finally introduced cross-cut flex grooves that improve bend and reduce the “plank” sensation the Ghost sometimes gave.

Those grooves matter. The Ghost 17 used to feel extremely stiff underfoot, almost like a block. With the new grooves the shoe gains life and allows natural toe-off that was missing in prior iterations. The sole remains durable and robust, but flexibility now exists where it needs to for a smoother gait.

Upper details: fit, tongue, and heel flare

The air mesh upper is breathable and stretchy. The trade-off is a slightly shorter tongue than expected. Photos may show a long, exposed tongue but in practice I found it a touch short. This did not create hotspots during runs, but it’s worth noting if you prefer a big, plush tongue or like to lace over a tall tongue for a snug fit.

The Achilles flare and extra heel armor change the shoe’s profile. It’s a comfort-first move that gives a secure feel at the back of the foot while maintaining structure. In short: the upper teams with the midsole to create a stable, cushioned package built for longevity.

Weight and target use

At 10.1 ounces the Brooks Ghost 17 sits in the heavier end of modern daily trainers. That weight aligns with the emphasis on rubber durability and stability. This is not a lightweight tempo shoe; it is a go-to daily trainer for mileage, recovery days, and anyone who prioritizes a consistent, comfortable ride over race-day shave-offs.

Pros and cons

• Pros
  • Comfortable, approachable fit that runs true to size.
  • More flexible than previous Ghosts thanks to new flex grooves.
  • Light stability features provide support without being obtrusive.
  • Durable outsole built to last high mileage.
  • Available in wide and extra-wide widths.
• Cons
  • Lingers on the firm side of cushion for runners wanting soft daily rides.
  • Weight is on the heavy side compared with some modern alternatives.
  • Tongue feels shorter than images suggest.
  • Retail price rose to $150, which feels high for this segment.

Who the Brooks Ghost 17 is best for

The Brooks Ghost 17 is ideal for runners who want a dependable, durable daily trainer that offers just enough softness to feel pleasant but not so much that it loses stability. It is perfect for:

• Everyday mileage and recovery runs.
• Runners who appreciate a predictable roll-off and stable platform.
• Those who need neutral shoes with light stability features.
• People who favor long-lasting outsoles and don’t mind some added weight.

If you chase ultra-plush feel or minimal weight, look elsewhere. If you want a shoe that will handle daily miles, feel controlled, and last, the Brooks Ghost 17 delivers.

Price and buying guide

The Brooks Ghost 17 lists at $150. That is a modest bump over previous model pricing and places the Ghost 17 in the same price bracket as many other daily trainers. If price sensitivity is a factor, consider the previous generation: the Brooks Ghost 16 can often be found for around $100 at reputable retailers and still represents a strong value if you love the Ghost fit.

My buying suggestion: if you have been avoiding the Ghost because it felt stale before, try the Brooks Ghost 17. If your Ghost 16 still serves you well and you want to save money, the Ghost 16 remains a solid option until stock runs out.

How the Brooks Ghost 17 stacks up to competitors

Two models that come to mind as direct comparators are the Puma Forever Run Nitro 2 and the Hoka Sky Flow. Both occupy similar real estate: approachable daily trainers with light stability cues and a focus on comfort.

Puma Forever Run Nitro 2

The Puma Forever Run Nitro 2 feels quite similar to the Brooks Ghost 17 underfoot. Both shoes carry Nitro or DNA Loft foam that leans a bit firm, and both include light stability strategies. The Forever Run Nitro 2 uses a dual-density Nitro foam that explicitly places firmer foam where stability is needed and softer foam where cushion matters. The result is a peppier, slightly more flexible shoe than the Ghost 17.

The Forever Run Nitro 2 also retails at $150. For me, it sometimes feels more lively and a touch more modern in styling. If you prefer a slightly snappier, more neutral-feeling ride while still getting light stability, the Puma is worth trying.

Hoka Sky Flow

The Hoka Sky Flow is another comparable daily trainer that sits in the “stability-adjacent but neutral-friendly” category. It has a wide footprint and a stable stance influenced by Hoka’s sculpting and foam shaping. The Sky Flow comes across as slightly firmer than a plush trainer and carries more of Hoka’s signature stability cues through foam geometry.

At $160 full retail the Sky Flow is pricier, although it frequently sells on discount. If you like Hoka’s platform and want a stable daily with room underfoot, the Sky Flow is an interesting alternative to the Brooks Ghost 17.

Final verdict

The Brooks Ghost 17 is a welcome refinement. Brooks made sensible updates — reduced drop, slightly more forefoot stack, flex grooves in the outsole, and an updated upper — that collectively transform the Ghost into a more relevant daily trainer for a broader set of runners. It keeps the Ghost’s signature predictability and durability while dialing in flexibility and a softer midfoot feel.

I wish Brooks had pushed the softness a little further or shaved weight, but I understand the trade-offs they chose to make. If you are a Ghost fan, this is the best Ghost in years. If you have avoided the Ghost for feeling too antiquated or too firm in the past, the Brooks Ghost 17 is the model to try.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Brooks Ghost 17 good for long runs and high mileage?

Yes. The Brooks Ghost 17’s durable outsole, stable platform, and comfortable fit make it a strong option for long runs and consistent mileage. The firmer midsole means it provides reliable support over repeated use.

How does the Brooks Ghost 17 compare to the Ghost 16?

The Ghost 17 reduces the drop from 12 mm to 10 mm, adds a touch more forefoot stack, includes new flex grooves in the outsole, and updates the upper with an Achilles flare. Ride differences are noticeable: the Ghost 17 feels slightly softer and more flexible, while the Ghost 16 can be a cost-effective, firmer alternative if you prefer a lower price.

Is the Brooks Ghost 17 suitable for overpronators?

The Ghost 17 is labeled neutral but contains light stability features that help resist inward roll. It can work well for mild overpronation, offering support without aggressive correction. Runners with severe overpronation should consider dedicated stability models.

What should I size up or down for the Brooks Ghost 17?

Stick with your usual running shoe size. The Ghost 17 runs true to size for most people and offers width options for wider feet.

Is the Brooks Ghost 17 worth the $150 retail price?

It depends on priorities. If you want a durable, stable, and updated Ghost and value the refinements, $150 is reasonable for retail pricing in this category. If you prioritize saving money, the Ghost 16 often retails significantly cheaper at trustworthy retailers and remains a solid option.

What alternative shoes should I consider?

Consider the Puma Forever Run Nitro 2 for a livelier, slightly more neutral-feeling ride, and the Hoka Sky Flow for a wide, stable platform with Hoka’s signature geometry. Both sit near the Ghost 17 in price and intent.

Closing thoughts

The Brooks Ghost 17 is a thoughtful evolution. It keeps what worked in previous Ghosts while nudging the model to feel fresher and more relevant. The ride is more pleasant for daily miles, the flex grooves solve some long-standing stiffness complaints, and the stability cues are present without being heavy-handed. If you want a durable, comfortable daily that won’t surprise you in a bad way, the Brooks Ghost 17 is worth trying.

The Puma MagMax 2 lands as Puma’s refined answer to the high-stack, long-run shoe market. I put this one through weeks of steady miles to see whether the changes from the original are meaningful and who should choose the Puma MagMax 2 over its closest rivals. If you want a high-stack daily that can swallow marathon miles and still feel lively, this review covers specs, fit, ride, comparisons, pros, cons and my honest recommendation.

Is Puma MagMax 2 Better for Daily Mileage Than Speed Sessions?

For most runners, yes. MagMax 2 is typically better suited to high-mileage comfort and steady training than short, aggressive speed-focused workouts.

Quick overview and what changed

Puma took a popular first attempt with the original MagMax and returned with the Puma MagMax 2. The brief was clear: keep the plush, durable mileage platform but make it lighter and a touch more responsive. The headline changes are substantial enough to matter in everyday training.

• Weight reduction: My UK size 12 sample dropped from 366g to 324g — a 42g reduction that translates to a noticeably nimbler feel on faster efforts.
• Updated midsole foam: Puma’s Nitrofoam has been retuned. It still delivers generous cushioning, but with more bounce and slightly improved responsiveness.
• Roomier toe box: The upper is more accommodating up front, which helps wider-footed runners or anyone who hated the snug front of version one.
• Same stack and drop: 46mm heel, 8mm drop — unchanged, so you still get the same high-stack ride but with reduced mass.
• Price: RRP stayed the same as the original, which I’ll discuss later when comparing value against competitors.

Key specifications

• Model: Puma MagMax 2
• Purpose: Easy runs, long runs, daily mileage — especially suited to heavier runners and high-mileage training.
• Stack height: 46mm heel / 38mm forefoot (8mm drop)
• Weight: 324g (UK size 12 sample)
• Midsole: Nitrofoam (nitrogen-infused compound, tuned for more bounce)
• Upper: Engineered knit with a stretchy woven tongue for comfort and lockdown
• Outsole: Puma Grip rubber coverage — slightly reduced to save weight but still grippy
• Pricing: £170 RRP

How it fits and feels on the run

The Puma MagMax 2 is a plush, high-stack shoe that surprises you with how lively it can feel. Because the team reduced weight and tweaked the Nitrofoam, the shoe doesn’t feel like a brick on your feet. Instead it moves with a sense of buoyancy that makes steady long miles feel less fatiguing and allows you to push into marathon pace efforts without the shoe feeling sluggish.

The engineered knit upper and the stretchy, woven tongue offer a comfortable, sock-like wrap. If you have wider feet, the Puma MagMax 2 will be a relief — there’s more room in the toe box than before and the knit stretches nicely. If you have narrow feet, expect a little giveaway at the front; I noticed some minor bunching on longer runs, but it didn’t affect performance.

Ride characteristics — what to expect

The Nitrofoam tuning on the Puma MagMax 2 gives a lively, bouncy sensation without turning the shoe into a carbon-plate race shoe. The rocker geometry is moderate; transitions feel smooth rather than aggressively propelled. That means you get:

• Comfort-forward cushioning that still allows for tempo or 10K-pace efforts.
• Responsive rebound that helps roll you forward through long repeats and marathon-paced runs.
• Secure upper that keeps the foot stable despite the high stack, aided by the knit and tongue combination.

What I liked

• Improved weight and nimbleness — The 42g drop in my size made a real difference. The MagMax 2 feels more versatile for training where you might want to pick up the pace occasionally.
• Springy, responsive midsole — It still prioritises comfort but now rewards a harder effort with a livelier rebound.
• Comfortable upper — The engineered knit and woven tongue equal a plush fit and good lockdown for long miles.
• Puma Grip outsole — Even with less rubber coverage than version one, grip on wet roads is excellent. That’s a standout for UK conditions.
• Durability — The first MagMax was famously long-lasting and the MagMax 2 looks and feels built to the same standard.

What I didn’t like

• Toe box width for narrow feet — The extra room is great for wide-footed runners, but if you’re narrow you might experience toe-box bunching.
• Price — At £170 it’s a premium ask. Puma usually leans good value, so this sits a little higher than I expected given close alternatives.
• Stability at corners — Max-stack shoes can feel slightly unsure through tight turns; Puma trimmed outsole coverage to save weight, and that reduces lateral stability a touch compared with shoes with full-length rubber.

Puma MagMax 2 vs main alternatives

When you’re choosing a high-stack daily you’re often weighing cushioning, responsiveness, durability and price. Two clear rivals for the Puma MagMax 2 are the Asics MetaRacer-style offering in the Megablast and Nike’s Vomero Plus. Both approach this market differently.

Puma MagMax 2 vs Asics Megablast

The Asics Megablast is lighter and uses a higher-end foam that feels more race-oriented. It will carry you faster on tempo sessions and key workouts because it offers a quicker turn of pace. The Megablast is less soft and plush than the Puma but more responsive at speed. If you want one shoe for race day or fast thresholds, the Megablast is closer to that. If you want a durable mileage monster that you can bank long runs in week after week, the Puma MagMax 2 has the edge.

Puma MagMax 2 vs Nike Vomero Plus

The Nike Vomero Plus is slightly cheaper and a little heavier — mostly due to a full-length outsole that adds stability. It feels firmer and a touch more reactive on quicker efforts than the Puma, while the Puma is softer and more comfort-driven. If you want a do-it-all high-stack daily that leans toward stability and slightly better quickness, the Nike Vomero Plus is a sensible pick. If your priority is long-run plushness, soft midsole comfort and durability, the Puma MagMax 2 is the better long-distance companion.

Who the Puma MagMax 2 is for

This shoe hits a specific sweet spot. Pick the Puma MagMax 2 if you:

• Log long miles regularly — marathon training, long runs and recovery days.
• Are a heavier runner who needs substantial cushion and durable construction.
• Want a high-stack shoe that still feels lively for tempo work and faster segments within training runs.
• Prefer a slightly roomier toe box and a comfortable knit upper.

Consider other options if you:

• Need a race-day, speed-first shoe — the Megablast or other race-oriented trainers will suit better.
• Prefer a narrow fit — you might find the Puma toe box a little loose.
• Are on a strict budget — the Vomero Plus offers close performance for less money in many markets.

Durability and real-world mileage

One of the original MagMax’s strongest traits was longevity. I put many happy kilometres on my version one pair and the Puma MagMax 2 looks built the same way. The Nitrofoam feels resilient and the outsole rubber, although reduced in coverage, uses Puma Grip in the right places. Expect this to hold up well over time compared with softer, faster foams that can compress more quickly.

Colors and aesthetics

Puma’s colour choices are bold. I particularly like the yellowway — it pops on the road and looks great with casual running layers. The modern knit upper gives the Puma MagMax 2 a contemporary silhouette that works both on long runs and in the gym when you need an all-day trainer.

Price and value

At £170 the Puma MagMax 2 is priced at the premium end of the daily trainer market. Puma often provides strong value, but here the price sits close to rivals with similar capabilities. If you can find the original MagMax discounted, it remains an excellent buy. But if you want the lighter, slightly bouncier ride and the updated fit, the Puma MagMax 2 justifies the premium for serious mileage runners who want comfort and durability.

Final verdict

Puma set out to make the Puma MagMax 2 lighter and more responsive while keeping everything runners loved about the original. Mission accomplished. The shoe feels less ponderous, more versatile, and retains the long-run comfort and durability that made the first MagMax stand out.

If you loved the original, you will likely love this one. If you find a version one on a deep discount, it is still a fantastic option. For runners building marathon mileage or anyone who wants a long-run workhorse that still reacts when you step on the gas, the Puma MagMax 2 is a top pick. If you need something more race-focused or prefer firmer reactivity for faster sessions, look at the Asics Megablast or the Nike Vomero Plus instead.

Does the Puma MagMax 2 run true to size?

The Puma MagMax 2 fits true to size in my experience. The upper is slightly more spacious in the toe box than the original, so if you are between sizes and prefer a snug fit you might consider sizing carefully, but standard sizing works well for most runners.

How much lighter is the Puma MagMax 2 compared to version one?

My UK size 12 sample weighed 324 grams versus 366 grams for version one, a drop of 42 grams. That reduction is noticeable and makes the shoe feel more nimble in training.

Is the Puma MagMax 2 good for marathon training?

Yes. The Puma MagMax 2 is built for long miles and durable enough for marathon training. Its cushioning and more responsive Nitrofoam make it comfortable for long runs while still allowing sustained efforts at marathon pace.

How does Puma MagMax 2 compare to the Nike Vomero Plus?

The Puma MagMax 2 is softer, slightly more comfortable and roomier, while the Nike Vomero Plus is firmer, a little more reactive and includes a full-length outsole for added stability. Price-wise the Vomero Plus is often cheaper; choose the Puma for plush long runs and the Vomero Plus for a slightly stabler, quicker-feeling daily trainer.

Will the outsole reduce durability because there is less rubber coverage?

Although the Puma MagMax 2 has slightly reduced outsole coverage compared with the original, the strategic placement of Puma Grip rubber preserves traction and should not significantly compromise overall durability. The midsole and upper construction still signal long-term resilience.

Closing thoughts

The Puma MagMax 2 is a refined mileage shoe that keeps the strengths of its predecessor while addressing weight and responsiveness — a combination that matters when you’re logging weekly long runs or training for a marathon. It is not a race-day rocket, but it is a durable, comfy and surprisingly lively workhorse that deserves serious consideration if you prioritize cushion and longevity.

If you want to compare options, test the Puma MagMax 2 against the Asics Megablast for faster, race-oriented foam, and the Nike Vomero Plus for a slightly firmer, stabler daily. For long distances and heavy mileage, the Puma MagMax 2 earns a strong recommendation from me.

The Asics Gel Nimbus 28 arrives as a clearer, lighter take on a long-running classic. I put in the miles, tested it across different conditions, and came away with a simple conclusion: this is still one of Asics’s best options for comfort-led running. The Asics Gel Nimbus 28 keeps the Nimbus DNA intact while trimming weight and refining the fit, but it also raises familiar questions about foam technology and price. Below I break down what changed, who will love it, and whether it deserves a spot in your rotation.

What the Asics Gel Nimbus 28 aims to be

The Asics Gel Nimbus 28 is built as a max-stack, comfort-first daily trainer. Its role is simple: provide reliable cushioning for easy runs, recovery days, and long miles on your feet. If you prioritize comfort over snappy responsiveness or racing speed, the Asics Gel Nimbus 28 is designed with you in mind.

Key specifications at a glance

• Purpose: Easy runs, recovery runs, long runs, and everyday comfort
• Price: About £180 in the UK (pricing can vary by region)
• Stack height: 43.5 mm (heel) with an 8 mm drop
• Weight: 335 g on my scale (men’s size sample)
• Midsole: FF Blast Plus with Asics PureGel in the rear
• Upper: Engineered knit (replaced the previous jacquard mesh)
• Outsole: Hybrid grip elements up front with AHAR Plus at the heel
• Widths: Standard and wide (extra wide available in some markets)

What changed versus the previous generation

The jump from version 27 to the Asics Gel Nimbus 28 is conservative but meaningful. The headline change is weight. On my scale the new model comes in at 335 grams, roughly 49 grams lighter than the 27. That reduction transforms the shoe’s feel on run, making it more agile and less cumbersome on easy days.

The upper material swapped from jacquard mesh back to an engineered knit. That contributes to a slightly narrower toe box and a more streamlined look. The outsole coverage has been pared down too. You still get durable rubber in key wear zones, but it is applied more sparingly, which likely helps save weight.

Ride and fit: What it feels like on the run

The Asics Gel Nimbus 28 keeps comfort at the forefront. Step into one and you immediately notice the cushioned, secure fit. Asics preserved the excellent gusseted tongue and a plush heel collar. Those two elements combine to give a secure, locked-in sensation that works equally well on easy miles or while standing around during travel.

The midsole is noticeably firmer than some of the ultra-squishy rivals on the market. FF Blast Plus with PureGel in the back absorbs impacts reliably without feeling marshmallowy. The trade-off is less bounciness and energetic return than shoes aimed at tempo or race-pace training.

Because the platform is firmer and slightly narrower, the Nimbus 28 feels more stable than many other max-stack options. You do not get that floppy side-to-side sensation some very soft shoes produce. For runners who like a secure, straightforward ride, the Asics Gel Nimbus 28 hits a solid midline between plush and planted.

Comfort features that stand out

• Gusseted tongue — stretchy, hugs the top of the foot, and prevents lace pressure
• Padded heel collar — locks the heel comfortably in place
• PureGel rear unit — reduces impact on longer runs without muddying stability
• Streamlined upper — engineered knit feels secure and less bulky than the previous jacquard

Durability and grip

The outsole uses targeted rubber placements rather than full-coverage rubber. That minimal approach saves weight and still provides dependable traction. From my testing, the grip has been reassuring on road surfaces and the limited rubber zones show no alarming wear early on. Historically, this line has had strong durability, and the Asics Gel Nimbus 28 looks set to continue that trend.

Who the Asics Gel Nimbus 28 is best for

The Asics Gel Nimbus 28 will suit a broad group of runners, but it is especially good for:

• Runners prioritizing comfort on easy and long runs
• Heavier runners who appreciate a stable, high-stack daily shoe
• Commuters and travellers who want a shoe that performs well off the run while being comfortable all day
• Runners who liked the previous Nimbus 27 but wanted a slightly leaner, lighter experience

Who should look elsewhere

If you are chasing a daily trainer with lively energy return and a springy ride for faster intervals, the Asics Gel Nimbus 28 is not the most obvious pick. Also, if budget is a major concern and you want the softest possible cushion for a lower price, there are alternatives that will feel plusher for less money.

Pros and cons

Pros

• Comfort: Still one of the most comfortable Asics daily shoes
• Weight reduction: Feels significantly lighter and more nimble than the previous model
• Stability: Firmer foam and a narrower platform give confidence on longer runs
• Day-to-day versatility: Works well for travel, commuting, and standing around
• Durability: Minimal but well-placed outsole rubber should last

Cons

• Price: At around £180 it sits at the top of the price spectrum for comfort trainers
• Less energetic: The midsole does not have the lively bounce of newer foams from some competitors
• Potential heat: The engineered knit upper could feel warm in hot summer months

How the Asics Gel Nimbus 28 compares to alternatives

Choosing between the Asics Gel Nimbus 28 and other high-stack daily trainers comes down to the ride you prefer.

Vs New Balance More v6

The New Balance More v6 is one of the softest, most pillowy shoes available. It costs less than the Asics Gel Nimbus 28 and delivers an unmistakable cloud-like ride. However, it is heavier and softer, which can feel less stable underfoot. If you want the plushest cushion and love running on a foam mattress, go New Balance More v6. If you want a firmer, more stable daily with superior lockdown, the Asics Gel Nimbus 28 is the better fit.

Vs Nike Vomero Plus

The Nike Vomero Plus brings more responsiveness and a slightly bouncier feel. It disguises its weight well and will hold faster paces more comfortably than the Asics Gel Nimbus 28. The Vomero tends to be more versatile for mixed-pace training. If you need a high-stack shoe that can handle quicker workouts as well as easy miles, the Vomero Plus is worth considering. If supreme day-to-day comfort and a slightly firmer, stable ride are your priority, the Asics Gel Nimbus 28 wins the comfort debate.

Fit and sizing notes

Sizing felt true to size for me. The toe box is slightly narrower compared with the previous generation, so if you run wide or prefer extra toe splay, consider trying the wide or extra-wide options where available. The gusseted tongue and secure heel cup mean you can dial in a snug fit without pressure points.

Price and value

The Asics Gel Nimbus 28 sits at a premium price point. I have mixed feelings about value. The shoe delivers excellent comfort, a refined feel, and a lighter build than before. But the midsole material is not the newest generation foam from competing brands, and at full retail price it can be hard to justify for some runners. If you find the previous model 27 on sale, it still represents strong value and a similar overall experience.

Practical tips if you buy them

• Try the standard width first; upgrade to wide if you have broader feet or like more toe room.
• Use the Asics Gel Nimbus 28 as a daily trainer for easy runs, recovery runs, and long steady efforts.
• Avoid choosing this shoe as your primary tempo or interval racer — it’s a comfort machine, not a performance rocket.
• If you plan to run in hot climates, test the upper in warmer weather to make sure the knit breathes comfortably for you.

Final verdict

The Asics Gel Nimbus 28 is a welcome evolution. It keeps the core strengths of the Nimbus line — comfort, secure fit, and durability — while trimming weight and tightening the silhouette. I still recommend it for runners who prioritize comfort and stability, especially heavier runners or those who spend long hours on their feet. It is less suited to runners chasing bouncy responsiveness or maximum energy return.

If you loved version 27, you will probably appreciate what the Asics Gel Nimbus 28 brings. If price is a major concern, keep an eye out for discounts on the 27 because that model still offers terrific value. Personally, I will continue to rotate the Asics Gel Nimbus 28 into my easy and long run days because it delivers exactly what I want from a comfort-first daily trainer.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Asics Gel Nimbus 28 good for long runs?

Yes. The Asics Gel Nimbus 28 is designed for long miles and easy runs. Its cushioning, stable platform, and secure fit make it comfortable for prolonged wear and sustained efforts at an easy pace.

How does the Asics Gel Nimbus 28 differ from the previous model?

The key differences are a lighter overall weight, a switch to an engineered knit upper from jacquard mesh, a slightly narrower toe box, and reduced outsole rubber coverage. These changes produce a more nimble feel and a sleeker look while preserving the line’s comfort.

Is the Asics Gel Nimbus 28 suitable for faster training or racing?

Not primarily. The Asics Gel Nimbus 28 performs best at easy and steady paces. It is firmer and more stable than ultra-plush alternatives but does not deliver the energetic pop of shoes designed for tempo runs or races.

What is the weight of the Asics Gel Nimbus 28?

On my scale the Asics Gel Nimbus 28 weighs about 335 grams for the sample tested, roughly 49 grams lighter than the previous model in my measurements.

Should I buy the Asics Gel Nimbus 28 or look at alternatives?

It depends on priorities. Buy the Asics Gel Nimbus 28 if you value stable, comfortable cushioning and everyday versatility. Choose alternatives like the New Balance More v6 for a softer cloud-like feel or the Nike Vomero Plus for a bouncier, more responsive daily trainer.

The New Balance Fresh Foam X More v6 is the kind of jumbo, max cushion shoe that makes other padded trainers look dainty. I spent time running, walking, and living in this shoe to figure out whether all that stack height actually translates into a useful running experience. This review covers specs, fit, on-road impressions, outsole and upper details, comparisons with similar max cushion shoes, who should buy it, where it fits in my rotation, and a practical buying guide. If you care about comfort and cushioning above everything else, the New Balance Fresh Foam X More v6 deserves a close look.

Quick overview: what is the New Balance Fresh Foam X More v6?

The New Balance Fresh Foam X More v6 is New Balance’s modern take on a maximalist daily trainer. Built entirely on Fresh Foam X, it brings a very high stack — 44 millimeters at the heel and 40 millimeters in the forefoot — with a 4 millimeter drop. That thick, single-foam midsole is sculpted to deliver cushioning and a stable platform without any additional foamy gimmicks. I went true to size in a US men’s 9 for this review and measured weight around 11.1 ounces or 316 grams, which is hefty but appropriate for this category.

Specs at a glance

• Stack height: 44 mm heel, 40 mm forefoot
• Drop: 4 mm
• Midsole: Fresh Foam X throughout
• Outsole: Thick rubber coverage with some exposed midfoot foam
• Upper: Plush, padded textile with knit-like tongue and cushioned heel cup
• Weight: 11.1 oz / 316 g (men’s US 9 measured)
• Price at launch: $160

Design and construction: simplicity with intent

New Balance kept the More v6 intentionally simple. There is one material doing the heavy lifting: Fresh Foam X. No embedded plates, no hybrid constructions. That single-foam approach is part of what defines this model. Fresh Foam X tends to be the more relaxed, comfort-oriented sibling to New Balance’s FuelCell foams, and that personality comes through here: forgiving, soft, and user-friendly for long runs and recovery days.

Visually the v6 resembles the v5, but New Balance made a few meaningful sculpting changes. The v5 had a bit more heel flare and a pronounced “trust” shape to stabilize the back of the shoe. In the v6 the heel is still wide, but the flaring is trimmed back. The result is a broad, predictable platform that feels less like a bulky landing pad and more like a cushioned but composed base. You still get that stable feel; it just feels cleaner underfoot.

Rocker and ride dynamics

The rocker in the More v6 is gradual and conservative. It starts where you expect it to for a cushioned easy-run shoe and rolls forward smoothly without an aggressive upward curl at the toe. That contrasts with the earlier More v4 which had a more pronounced rocker and a taper toward the forefoot. In v6 the stack carries its thickness further forward before tapering close to the toes, which keeps each transition soft and stable. If you want a shoe that spoons your foot through long, slow rotations rather than flinging you forward, the New Balance Fresh Foam X More v6 does that well.

Outsole and protection

New Balance updated the outsole compared to last year. There is slightly more exposed foam in the midfoot and arch area, but the rubber they do include is thick and generous where it counts. I didn’t run into traction issues or wear concerns during my testing miles; the outsole provides durability and predictable traction on pavement and typical suburban surfaces. If you spend a lot of time on rough, abrasive pavement or gravel, you may notice the exposed foam more quickly, but for most runners this setup balances weight and protection effectively.

Upper, fit, and comfort

The upper is all about softness. It is not an ultra-elastic knit; it sits in a middle ground where it is not rigid but also not wafty or flimsy. Padding is the name of the game here — in the tongue, around the ankle, and through the heel cup. The tongue and collar have a couch-like softness that makes slipping into the shoe feel cozy. There is real structure in the heel so your heel sits in a cup and does not float around. The Fresh Foam X wraps up into the footbed to create a subtle cupping sensation under the foot that reinforces that secure fit.

I tested the shoe in my usual size and found ample room through the toe box and a comfortable midfoot volume. New Balance offers wide sizing in the Fresh Foam family, so if you need extra lateral space, the wide variant is an easy option. For my foot the true-to-size fit worked well: enough space without slop.

Laces and lockdown

My one gripe with the upper is the lacing. New Balance used stretchy laces here, which are comfortable and help accommodate foot swelling during long days on your feet. For me those laces mean I have to cinch everything down hard at the start of a run to get them to settle into a comfortable position. If you prefer a completely hands-off fit you might like the stretch; if you like a locked-in feel without stopping to re-tie, you might prefer a traditional flat lace. I found myself stopping mid-run on a few occasions to tighten and re-set the laces so the shoe could better wrangle the weight underfoot.

Weight and how it matters

I measured the shoe at 11.1 ounces or 316 grams in men’s US 9. This is a substantial shoe and it feels like it underfoot. That is not a criticism so much as context: max cushion shoes trade nimbleness for plushness. If you want a daily max cushion shoe for easy miles, recovery runs, and lots of walking or standing, the weight is perfectly fine. If you want something to push paces or do intervals in, this is not the one.

On-road experience: is it a runner again?

This is where the New Balance Fresh Foam X More v6 impressed me most. After a couple of versions where New Balance seemed to nudge both the More and the 1080 toward a market that favored walking and all-day standing comfort, the v6 feels like a runner’s shoe once more. The v5 and the previous 1080 iterations were excellent for comfort but they had trade-offs that dulled their running DNA. With the More v6 the balance shifts back toward what you want from a recovery and easy run shoe.

On easy days the More v6 feels like a pillow that still moves with your foot. The Fresh Foam X provides a soft landing and enough rebound to keep your stride from turning sloppy. On recovery days after a hard effort, the shoe takes the sting out of each step. The wide platform makes each footstrike predictable, and because the heel flare is dialed back a touch the shoe feels more composed when you change cadence or direction lightly.

When not to use the More v6

I wouldn’t choose the New Balance Fresh Foam X More v6 for speed work, tempo runs, or anything that requires quick responsiveness. It’s bulky and heavy compared with lightweight trainers or carbon-plated shoes. If you want a single shoe that covers all your training from easy to threshold, pick something else. The More v6 excels when comfort, cushion, and low-impact recovery are the priority.

Comparisons: where the More v6 sits against rivals

How does the New Balance Fresh Foam X More v6 stack up against the other big max cushion shoes? I’ll focus on two direct competitors — the Hoka Bondi 9 and the Puma MagMax — because they occupy similar price and purpose space.

New Balance Fresh Foam X More v6 vs Hoka Bondi 9

The Bondi 9 is one of the earliest modern max cushion shoes and a consistent favorite. Hoka gave the Bondi a few modern tweaks this generation, and the result is a shoe that feels slightly more lively than the More v6. Both shoes use straightforward foam, both deliver plush cushioning, and both are targets for long slow runs and recovery days.

Two practical differences:

• Sizing. I find the Bondi runs a bit small and would recommend going up half a size. The More v6 in my true size felt fine.
• Character. The Bondi delivers a touch more bounce and nimbleness. If you want a max cushion shoe that still feels a little springy, Bondi will please you. The More v6 leans more toward soft stability and a composed ride.

Price is another point. Bondi 9 typically launches at a higher price than the More v6. At the time I tested, the Bondi 9 sat around $175 versus $160 for the More v6, so you pay a modest premium for the Bondi’s slightly livelier feel.

New Balance Fresh Foam X More v6 vs Puma MagMax

Puma’s MagMax represents a different take on max cushion: it marries high stack height with a bouncy, modern foam and a wide platform that feels dynamic and playful. The MagMax is springier than the More v6 and, crucially, accomplishes a lot of that liveliness without an overly puffy upper. Puma kept the upper restrained and used a knit tongue and minimal padding, which I appreciated.

For me the MagMax offers the most modern max cushion experience of the three. It is bouncy, fun, and stable. The trade-off is price: the MagMax tends to be at the top end (around $180), whereas the New Balance Fresh Foam X More v6 is more affordable at $160. If your budget is flexible and you prioritize a lively feel, the MagMax is worth the extra spend. If you want maximum cushion, a plush upper, and a lower price, the More v6 is a strong choice.

Pros and cons summary

• Pros
  • Exceptionally comfortable Fresh Foam X cushioning for easy and recovery runs
  • Wide, predictable platform that still feels composed thanks to subtle heel sculpting
  • Plush upper that locks the heel into a secure cup while delivering premium comfort
  • Competitive price point at $160 for a max cushion trainer
  • Available in wide sizes
• Cons
  • Heavy compared with lighter daily trainers and not suitable for speed work
  • Stretch laces may require frequent re-tightening for a locked-in fit
  • Some exposed foam under the arch could be a concern for high-mileage abrasive surfaces

Who should buy the New Balance Fresh Foam X More v6?

Choose the New Balance Fresh Foam X More v6 if:

• You want a daily trainer optimized for long easy runs and recovery miles.
• You spend lots of time standing or walking and want a shoe that doubles between runs and daily wear.
• You have a wider foot and may need a wide option; New Balance supports this shape well in the Fresh Foam line.
• You prefer a plush, cushioned upper and a soft tongue and collar for comfort on long outings.

Skip the More v6 if:

• You need a shoe for speed work, tempo runs, or racing — the shoe is simply too heavy and soft for those tasks.
• You dislike thick, puffy uppers or prefer a very minimal, tight-fitting race-day aesthetic.
• You run primarily on very abrasive surfaces and worry about exposed midfoot foam wear.

Buying guide and price considerations

The New Balance Fresh Foam X More v6 launched at $160, which is $5 more than last year. I suspect tariffs and general market pressure contributed to the modest increase. For the cushioning and comfort you get, $160 is competitive in the current landscape of max cushion shoes. If you are strictly looking for a walking or standing shoe and want to save a few bucks, hunt for leftover inventory of the More v5, though those are getting scarce.

My practical buying tips:

1. Buy your normal running size for the More v6 unless you know you need a half size up from other brands. New Balance sizes tend to run true for me.
2. Consider the wide option if your feet are broad or your toes need extra splay. The Fresh Foam family tends to be friendly for wider feet.
3. Swap the laces if you prefer a firmer lockdown. A set of flat, low-stretch laces will change the feel significantly and reduce the need to re-tighten mid-run.
4. If you plan to do heavier mileage on rough pavement, consider rotating with a shoe that has full rubber coverage to preserve midsole life.

How I used the New Balance Fresh Foam X More v6 in my running week

I primarily used the More v6 for easy runs, recovery days after hard sessions, and as an all-day shoe when I expected long hours on my feet. Strides and short pickups felt fine when done conservatively, but whenever I tried to push pace significantly the shoe’s mass and soft platform reminded me it was not built for speed. Its real strength is in smoothing out recovery days and making long, low-effort miles feel forgiving. I happily reached for it the day after long tempos or intervals because it takes the edge off foot and leg soreness.

Durability impressions

After several weeks of testing the More v6 shows minimal outsole wear in areas with rubber. The exposed foam in the midfoot has not deteriorated in my time with the shoe, but that area does feel like it could become more noticeable over many months of heavy daily runs. For most runners who will rotate between shoes or use this primarily for easy mileage, durability should be acceptable. The plush upper has held up well to repeated usage and remains comfortable without compressing dramatically.

Final verdict

The New Balance Fresh Foam X More v6 is an easy recommendation if your priority is plush comfort, predictable stability, and a runner-friendly max cushion experience. It returns the More franchise to a place where I feel comfortable recommending it as a runner’s daily max cushion option rather than a shoe designed primarily for walking. It is not for everyone — it’s heavy, it is not nimble, and the stretchy laces may bother some — but for recovery, long easy runs, and days when comfort is king, the More v6 is a strong pick.

Alternatives to consider

• Hoka Bondi 9 — slightly more lively and a good alternative if you want a bit more bounce. Consider sizing up half a size.
• Puma MagMax — the most modern-feeling max cushion shoe in this small set, bouncy and stable, but pricier.
• Previous New Balance More versions — if you find a good deal on v5 and primarily want walking comfort, that could be a budget-friendly option.

FAQs

Is the New Balance Fresh Foam X More v6 good for long runs?

Yes. The New Balance Fresh Foam X More v6 excels at long easy runs and recovery runs because of its thick Fresh Foam X cushioning and stable platform. It offers forgiving landings and predictable transitions, making it comfortable for extended low-effort mileage.

Should I size up for the New Balance Fresh Foam X More v6?

No, I went true to size and found the fit comfortable. New Balance offers wide sizes if you need extra room. Unlike some rivals that run small, the More v6 is generally true to standard sizing.

How heavy is the New Balance Fresh Foam X More v6?

I measured my sample (US men’s 9) at about 11.1 ounces or 316 grams. That is typical for a max cushion shoe and appropriate given the thick Fresh Foam X midsole.

Can I use the New Balance Fresh Foam X More v6 for speed workouts?

No. The More v6 is not designed for speed work or tempo sessions. Its mass and soft platform make it best suited for easy and recovery runs. Use a lighter, more responsive trainer or a daily performance shoe for faster workouts.

How does the New Balance Fresh Foam X More v6 compare to the Hoka Bondi 9?

Both shoes are max cushion and comfortable. The Bondi 9 feels slightly more lively and bouncy, while the More v6 leans toward soft stability and a plush upper. Bondi often costs more, and I recommend going up half a size on the Bondi if you try it.

Is the exposed foam on the outsole a problem?

Not in typical running conditions. There is some exposed foam under the arch on the More v6, but New Balance provides thick rubber where it matters. If you run on very abrasive surfaces daily, consider a shoe with full rubber coverage or rotate regularly to extend midsole life.

What is the price of the New Balance Fresh Foam X More v6?

The launch price is $160. That is $5 more than last year’s price and still competitive for a max cushion shoe. If you want to save money, look for remaining inventory of prior versions, though those are becoming scarce.